4 ms·
It is the definition of symmetrical. Both parties can cut ties at any time without any warning. In general employers are able to benefit from this symmetrical
by gitfan86 4y ago
It is the definition of symmetrical. Both parties can cut ties at any time without any warning.
In general employers are able to benefit from this symmetrical relationship more often though since they are only losing a small percentage of their workers while the employee is losing 100% of the income they were getting from that employeer.
- Volundr 4y agoSymmetry can exist on one axis but not another. Sure it's symmetrical on the "actions an entity can take axis", but when people refer to the employee/employer relationship being asymmetrical they are discussing the risk or impact axis.
- SantalBlush 4y ago>It is the definition of symmetrical. GP was clearly talking about the assymetry of consequences, not the action itself. You intentionally misinterpreted them.