4 ms·

No you didn’t. At no point did you attempt to present conflicting numbers. Instead you sunk to lazy trolling with “is anything true?? question everything!”. Ye

by prvit 4y ago

No you didn’t. At no point did you attempt to present conflicting numbers. Instead you sunk to lazy trolling with “is anything true?? question everything!”. Yeah, you can dismiss literally any conversation like that. You started playing games with meanings of well defined words like “terrorism”. It’s like arguing that the sky being blue is just a matter of opinion, completely pointless.

mistermann 4y ago
> No you didn’t. Yes, I did. > At no point did you attempt to present conflicting numbers. a) False: "Another common reference is this one, which has numbers as high as 1,000,000+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War" b) Presenting a competing theory is not even a requirement of disputing a claim - dispute: "to question the truth or rightness of dispute a statement" > Instead you sunk to lazy trolling with “is anything true?? question everything!”. Yeah, you can dismiss literally any conversation like that. Do you lack the ability to see what you are doing here? Are you not literally asserting that appealing to what is actually true is necessarily ~invalid, and can only be "trolling"? > You started playing games with meanings of well defined words like “terrorism”. It’s like arguing that the sky being blue is just a matter of opinion, completely pointless. I often wonder: what would people like you do if someone was to ever take away your memes...do you have anything to fall back on? I challenge you to utilize the same mode of thinking that you would apply when discussing code, processors, or that sort of thing. If you instead choose to continue with your current mode, I will continue to mock you as I am doing now (and to moderators: if people can engage in insults and bald-faced lying, is some teasing in response really that inappropriate?). I look forward to seeing your reaction.
- prvit 4y ago
  > a) False: "Another common reference is this one, which has numbers as high as 1,000,000+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War" I say: “Distance between x and y is 10 kilometers” You say: “Another common reference states that the distance between y and z is 10000 kilometers” You are not disputing anything, you’re either particularly stupid or trolling. > I challenge you to utilize the same mode of thinking that you would apply when discussing code, processors, or that sort of thing You first.
  - mistermann 4y ago
    I will simply repeat this: I often wonder: what would people like you do if someone was to ever take away your memes...do you have anything to fall back on? More memes please, I enjoy them! Go ahead, tell me how it really is, rational adult human. Wow me with your intellect.

by prvit 4y ago

mistermann 4y ago

> No you didn’t. Yes, I did. > At no point did you attempt to present conflicting numbers. a) False: "Another common reference is this one, which has numbers as high as 1,000,000+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War" b) Presenting a competing theory is not even a requirement of disputing a claim - dispute: "to question the truth or rightness of dispute a statement" > Instead you sunk to lazy trolling with “is anything true?? question everything!”. Yeah, you can dismiss literally any conversation like that. Do you lack the ability to see what you are doing here? Are you not literally asserting that appealing to what is actually true is necessarily ~invalid, and can only be "trolling"? > You started playing games with meanings of well defined words like “terrorism”. It’s like arguing that the sky being blue is just a matter of opinion, completely pointless. I often wonder: what would people like you do if someone was to ever take away your memes...do you have anything to fall back on? I challenge you to utilize the same mode of thinking that you would apply when discussing code, processors, or that sort of thing. If you instead choose to continue with your current mode, I will continue to mock you as I am doing now (and to moderators: if people can engage in insults and bald-faced lying, is some teasing in response really that inappropriate?). I look forward to seeing your reaction.

prvit 4y ago
> a) False: "Another common reference is this one, which has numbers as high as 1,000,000+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War" I say: “Distance between x and y is 10 kilometers” You say: “Another common reference states that the distance between y and z is 10000 kilometers” You are not disputing anything, you’re either particularly stupid or trolling. > I challenge you to utilize the same mode of thinking that you would apply when discussing code, processors, or that sort of thing You first.
- mistermann 4y ago
  I will simply repeat this: I often wonder: what would people like you do if someone was to ever take away your memes...do you have anything to fall back on? More memes please, I enjoy them! Go ahead, tell me how it really is, rational adult human. Wow me with your intellect.