3 ms·
Bad enough to make you want to quit. People nowadays complain about algos and red-black tress but honestly, that was the easy bit. Wasn't much open source, so
by he11ow 4y ago
Bad enough to make you want to quit.
People nowadays complain about algos and red-black tress but honestly, that was the easy bit. Wasn't much open source, so you had to build pretty much from scratch. Internet was young and empty, so big fat books were how you learned. No condensed version or easy trouble shooting. C and C++ were as dominant as Python is today, but nowhere near as fun. (https://xkcd.com/353/ https://xkcd.com/353/)
In short, the deal was to be a cog. If you were good as a small cog, you'd move up to be a bigger cog. Then you could manage a few cogs doing a tiny bit of a huge machine. The scrappiness of just throwing things together and getting something meaningful quick simply wasn't there.
I left, spent 15 years of my career doing decidedly different things, and when I came back I was overjoyed with how little code you actually needed now to get stuff done.
- PaulDavisThe1st 4y ago> I left, spent 15 years of my career doing decidedly different things, and when I came back I was overjoyed with how little code you actually needed now to get stuff done. Must be a function of whatever you've did when you came back. The amount of code you need to implement the stuff I work on has probably increased (partly because user expectations have expanded).
- he11ow 4y agoI was inexact with my wording. I don't think you need less code overall, just that so much of it has been written by others. For sure a lot of the reference depends on what I was doing then and now. Both times involved data and ML, though different domains. *Shrug*, I like it better now.