4 ms·
> This still doesn't explain why we don't see evidence of life though... It is an adequately plausible explanation of why we haven't yet seen evidence of life
by mannykannot 4y ago
> This still doesn't explain why we don't see evidence of life though...
It is an adequately plausible explanation of why we haven't yet seen evidence of life elsewhere. To argue against it seems to require one or more question-begging premises.
- singularity2001 4y agoOr we are seeing life everywhere, we just don't “see” (i.e. grasp) it.
- swagasaurus-rex 4y agoObligatory – They're made out of meat https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/thinkingMeat.html https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/think...
- goatlover 4y agoSuch as intelligent life having billions of years to send probes, build powerful radio beacons, and form galactic civilizations? It is called the Fermi Paradox because the physicists did some basic calculations at how long it would take to colonize the galaxy.
- mannykannot 4y agoSo we have two sets of calculations: the ones you are referring to here, and those that MontyCarloHall brought up. Of this pair, only the latter predicts the observation that kypro brought up.