3 ms·
> At no point did the episode show this as a good thing. But the question isn't whether it's shown as a good thing, the bar was "Violence [is] the failure to s
by morelisp 4y ago
> At no point did the episode show this as a good thing.
But the question isn't whether it's shown as a good thing, the bar was "Violence [is] the failure to solve a problem, never [a] true solution." Presenting the violence as necessary is still diametrically opposed to this, in some ways even more than showing violence in a positive but unnecessary light.
That's a genuinely uncommon attitude in genre fiction. Reducing it to any situation where a show posits "do the ends justify the means? perhaps!" - which is the basis of like, every piece of high-stakes TV today - does a disservice to the original critique and the TNG episodes which argue otherwise (and frankly, also to the deftness with which DS9 does usually present it).
- uxcolumbo 4y agoMaybe it's a goal that the Federation aspires to, but it's not black and white and can't always be achieved, as demonstrated by many episodes in TNG and DS9. Maybe the idea is if you set the bar high it will reduce violence and that's the best we can achieve?