4 ms·
This is true, and the congestion mentioned here was subtle and not called out - typically flows are handled in a stateless manner by load balancers that hash on
by ghshephard 4y ago
This is true, and the congestion mentioned here was subtle and not called out - typically flows are handled in a stateless manner by load balancers that hash on some set of MAC/IP/PORT features of the packet. This is where congestion occurs and the paper mentions it here:
All that is needed for congestion is for two large flows
to hash to the same intermediate link; this hot spot will persist
for the life of the flows and cause delays for any other
messages that also pass over the affected link.
It makes logical sense, but I'd love to see the evidence for this.
- topranks 4y ago“Elephant” flows are a definitely a thing. It all depends on the application and overall use in of the network. With sufficient flows and a mix of sizes it’ll still tend to even out. But if you’ve significant high-throughout, long lived flows this is definitely something you might hit.