I think this was one of the most interesting parts of the article: The other question that made sense was from Chief Justice Roberts: CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: S

I think this was one of the most interesting parts of the article: The other question that made sense was from Chief Justice Roberts: CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: So I have a great idea. You take wood, you put it on a grate, you light it, and you get heat. That recites a series of acts performed in the physical world that transforms the subject of the process, the wood, to achieve a useful result, which is heat. So I can get a patent for that? Believe it or not, the answer was no, not because it's not patentable subject matter, but because it's not novel. So cavemen entrepreneurs could have patented it?