2 ms·
It'd be sensible to the ISP to just disconnect these from the network, particularly if they can't get their shit together after a warning.
by snvzz 4y ago
It'd be sensible to the ISP to just disconnect these from the network, particularly if they can't get their shit together after a warning.
- lucb1e 4y agoI keep thinking the same. It's the best option short of just targeting it against themselves and causing just enough nuisance that they either firewall, upgrade, or correctly configure these ancient protocols. For example for the protocol that this article is about: "Windows 2000 Server requires UDP" https://wiki.wireshark.org/MS-CLDAP https://wiki.wireshark.org/MS-CLDAP. Anything newer than Win2k means you can already turn it off.
- iforgotpassword 4y agoTo me it's crazy that a religious organization apparently has a 17gbits+ connection to the internet. Admittedly I'm not an expert and only know of one that I'd consider large enough here, but yeah... Second question is why their ISP never had any alarm bells going off with such a traffic pattern.