4 ms·
>The ability to chop up the ISA is going to have ugly side-effects The instruction set is already reduced (hense RISC) to the bare minimum for the two importan
by Vt71fcAqt7 4y ago
>The ability to chop up the ISA is going to have ugly side-effects
The instruction set is already reduced (hense RISC) to the bare minimum for the two important profiles: microcontrolers and linux machines. Microcontrollers will be 32-bit and will nessesarliy have a different tool-chain from 64 bit computers as they won't be running Linux. The only question is will most Linux machines use vector. That is probably a yes. X-86 and ARM are allready fragmented and the software ecosystem survived. Nobody is adding custom instruction to a reduced instuction set just for the sake of it. Also, as RISC-V machines will only run on Linux for at least the next few years, all the software and compilers are open already. So there is no way for a single vendor to lock in the ecosystem.
- snvzz 4y ago>The only question is will most Linux machines use vector. That is probably a yes. And, while RVA22 does not require vector, the next profile, whenever that happens, is.