3 ms·
On the other side, the neutral way, the 50 renders szenes is the appeal and the challenge for the photographer. A wide-angle or strong tele lens add a lot to th
by _ph_ 4y ago
On the other side, the neutral way, the 50 renders szenes is the appeal and the challenge for the photographer. A wide-angle or strong tele lens add a lot to the picture themselves, by their extreme angles of view. The 50 does nothing like that, puts all the burdon on to the photographer. Yet, a lot of the most iconic pictures have been taken by a 50.
- oldstrangers 4y agoI'm not sure I'd call using a 50 a burden on the photographer, I think they're probably a lot more intuitive for most photographers. A 50 was the first lens I bought during school, and it was widely regarded as the preferred lens for photography classes from beginner to advanced. I love the 50, I just personally don't have much use for one currently.
- _ph_ 4y agoI haven't said burden, but a challenge. Because the lense won't create fancy effects on its own. It is purely the task of the photographer to make something out of it. That was in answer to the post which preferred wider and longer lenses because of their effects. Yes, a 50 should be intuitive to use.