3 ms·
The article offers zero evidence that it is legal to falsely shout fire in a crowded theatre. But still feels it can lecture a judge who would be one of 9 peop
by LatteLazy 4y ago
The article offers zero evidence that it is legal to falsely shout fire in a crowded theatre. But still feels it can lecture a judge who would be one of 9 people to actually ultimately decide such a case in the US. How poor.
- kbelder 4y agoIt's presumed legal unless there's a law against it, and since it's speech, protected by the first amendment, the bar for outlawing it is very high.
- LatteLazy 4y agoThat's lovely. Now I just need to trawl through 200 years of court rulings to actually know. And that's what I'd do if I was writing an article on the subject. Instead Reason just asserts it and offers nothing to back up their assertion...