* Where do we know about this ramp-down from? * In the ISO C++ committee, people lose important votes all the time, again and again. Good features often take y

* Where do we know about this ramp-down from? * In the ISO C++ committee, people lose important votes all the time, again and again. Good features often take years before they gain enough support to be accepted. The committee - despite what the external perception might be - is actually quite hesitant and conservative, at least where it comes to affecting the behavior of existing code. In other words, there isn't such a thing as _the_ ABI vote, it's _an_ ABI vote. So it seems questionable that Google's whole C++ strategy would hinge on that one vote.