Where exactly is the kerfuffle here? Is the crux of the issue that the community thought it owned the trademark when in fact it was owned by the initial creator

Where exactly is the kerfuffle here? Is the crux of the issue that the community thought it owned the trademark when in fact it was owned by the initial creator? Whether contributors fork or not, the code is MIT licensed, anyone can start a consulting organization around a piece of MIT code. What is Lunny absconding with here?