3 ms·
If this were true, then you must be presenting a single-sided story. Even for one murder, people typically get ten years or more (presuming no mitigating circum
by lucb1e 4y ago
If this were true, then you must be presenting a single-sided story. Even for one murder, people typically get ten years or more (presuming no mitigating circumstances). But the sibling comments already revealed that your claim of freedom in ten years is not true in the first place.
- twelve40 4y agoyou are wrong, I did not say anything about sentence of 10 years.
- lucb1e 4y agoan assumption based on the only available information: 2033 is about ten years from now. For all I know, their life expectancy was until 2015 and they turn 100 years old in 2033, which could be reasonable. Since that made little sense as a sentence to be unimpressed by, I figured it was more likely a case you recently heard about and 2033-$recent=~10. Maybe give some more info about the case then? Such as why they 'only' (in your eyes) got the sentence they got?
- twelve40 4y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik