3 ms·
Invoke, shared a few weeks ago, uses MIT and adheres to best practices in respecting model licenses/requirements (e.g., agreeing to not use it for hate speech,
by sophrocyne 4y ago
Invoke, shared a few weeks ago, uses MIT and adheres to best practices in respecting model licenses/requirements (e.g., agreeing to not use it for hate speech, harming others, etc.)
Automatic on the other hand, seems actively opposed to responding to the calls (cries?) for him to clarify a license for the repo.
Closed without being addressed - https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/issues/24 https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/issu...
21 days open without response - https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/issues/2059 https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/issu...
We definitely need more projects who are completely open source (both WebUI and backend) to contribute to the ecosystem, and do so responsibly, adhering to lawful and ethical usage of the work of others.
- carefree0910 4y agoI noticed that they added a `LICENSE-ModelWeights.txt`! Maybe I should dive into their repo deeper and follow their good practices. Thanks a lot for the advice! It really helps!
- RobotToaster 4y agoMy understanding is the "ethical requirements" of the model licence preclude it from being used in any completely FOSS software, as it would violate freedom 0 by restricting the purposes someone can use the software for.
- Kiro 4y agoIf he doesn't want to add a license he shouldn't be bullied into adding one.
- tough 4y agoBut then how will big corps be able to steal his free code without any legal repercussions? </s>