I think anybody that saw the "pay to play" debacle with all of the medical journals at the turn of the century approach "medical and health (i call it healff, b

I think anybody that saw the "pay to play" debacle with all of the medical journals at the turn of the century approach "medical and health (i call it healff, because they obviously got two "F's" in the subject) with realism and a bit of scepticism. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702092/ "fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism" indicates the industry itself is beyond a crisis. The comments/article show that a "for profit" system is everybody's problem, but even socialized healthcare does not provide even coverage for a long list of ailments. The news coverage in Austrailia on Teo and neurosurgeons shows where disabilities as a plaything are equally as unethical. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/neurosurgeon-charlie-teo-fires-off-at-disgusting-60-mins-piece/news-story/e3d6111e756c149b932c048d1f6df076 https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/neurosurgeon-charli... The only recourse for disabled and ablebodied persons is to keep trying until you find a trained professional that can accomodate your specific needs (provided you can afford their services). Perhaps people with disabilaties would be better served seeking healthcare at medical education facilities, where training/learning is still paramount versus the scar tissue already embeded in the system (not being paid for services from insurers, unreasonably low rates, etc).