Thank you for your feedback. Can you clarify? What is the "first page" that you are referring to? Can you paste a link to it along with the broken examples li

Thank you for your feedback. Can you clarify? What is the "first page" that you are referring to? Can you paste a link to it along with the broken examples link? This Hacker News submission features the blog post under this URL: https://djedr.github.io/posts/jevko-2022-02-22.html https://djedr.github.io/posts/jevko-2022-02-22.html Clearly, you are not talking about this page, as that contains multiple links rather than a singular link. Perhaps you are talking about the specification which is here: https://github.com/jevko/specifications/blob/master/spec-standard-grammar.md https://github.com/jevko/specifications/blob/master/spec-sta... (linked from the blog post) and here: https://jevko.org/spec.html https://jevko.org/spec.html (linked from jevko.org) All three link to Jevko examples here: https://github.com/jevko/examples https://github.com/jevko/examples but all these examples links seem to be correct on my end. I agree about the importance of examples, and I try to lead with them on jevko.org and jevko.github.io (which are the front pages of Jevko -- possibly I should merge them into one). However a formal specification is not necessarily the place to put the leading examples. This is also where the Subjevko rule is defined. It isn't quite introduced as "known knowledge" -- the purpose of a specification is to define the unknown, more or less from the ground up. This is also why specifications tend to get a little abstract. Jevko's spec is no exception. This should be in line with expectations of authors of tools such as parsers, validators, generators, or other kinds of processors, for which the spec is the authoritative reference. It is not necessarily the best first place to look for explanation, if you are approaching from a more casual side. I agree that from that side a clear picture of what Jevko is and how it can be used is still lacking. I certainly should add more examples and explain the concepts with analogies. So I appreciate the essence of your advice and hope I'll manage to improve on that.