12 ms·

Thank you for your medical diagnosis of my speech patterns. But the fact that you conflate the 2 decade old AIXI with the 5 decade old Solomonoff Induction des

Thank you for your medical diagnosis of my speech patterns. But the fact that you conflate the 2 decade old AIXI with the 5 decade old Solomonoff Induction despite my attempt to filter out ignoramuses with the 2 fallacies (neither of which mention AIXI and one of which specifically singles out AI/AGI for elimination), I'm afraid you've just been filtered, along with your medical diagnosis.

koyanisqatsi 4y ago
That's fine. Good luck with your endeavor but I still think you should contact some friends and family. If that's not possible then a helpline might also be beneficial: https://sczaction.org/helpline/ https://sczaction.org/helpline/ (toll-free number: 800-493-2094). We can also continue this thread if you want but you'll have to make more coherent points about what exactly you're trying to achieve with Solomonoff induction. Most of the research on AIXI(tl) is pretty much complete. Whatever could be recovered from computable distributions and agents that learn properties of that distribution to maximize some kind of objective has already been mostly figured out by Hutter. The theory is complete so unless you have some other ideas I don't think there is anything worthwhile left to research with Solomonoff induction and computational agents based on that formalism.
- jabowery 4y ago
  "Tendencies of physicians in training to be overconfident have to be taken into consideration to ensure the appropriate degree of supervision and feedback." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect I don't know that my diagnosis is correct, but it certainly seems to be the case that your continual referral back to AIXI despite it being excluded from consideration in my original post and then re-excluded in my most recent comment indicates that your reading comprehension (including my "speech patterns") isn't nearly what you think it is. Of course, another explanation is that you are simply a troll, but that is a decreasingly likely explanation.

koyanisqatsi 4y ago

That's fine. Good luck with your endeavor but I still think you should contact some friends and family. If that's not possible then a helpline might also be beneficial: https://sczaction.org/helpline/ https://sczaction.org/helpline/ (toll-free number: 800-493-2094). We can also continue this thread if you want but you'll have to make more coherent points about what exactly you're trying to achieve with Solomonoff induction. Most of the research on AIXI(tl) is pretty much complete. Whatever could be recovered from computable distributions and agents that learn properties of that distribution to maximize some kind of objective has already been mostly figured out by Hutter. The theory is complete so unless you have some other ideas I don't think there is anything worthwhile left to research with Solomonoff induction and computational agents based on that formalism.

jabowery 4y ago
"Tendencies of physicians in training to be overconfident have to be taken into consideration to ensure the appropriate degree of supervision and feedback." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect I don't know that my diagnosis is correct, but it certainly seems to be the case that your continual referral back to AIXI despite it being excluded from consideration in my original post and then re-excluded in my most recent comment indicates that your reading comprehension (including my "speech patterns") isn't nearly what you think it is. Of course, another explanation is that you are simply a troll, but that is a decreasingly likely explanation.