Several commenters have pointed out these defects in the regexes reported in the article, and you’ve replied by telling us that, in addition to all its other fa

Several commenters have pointed out these defects in the regexes reported in the article, and you’ve replied by telling us that, in addition to all its other faults, it misrepresents the code it’s supposedly describing; in my case going as far as to tell me that I’m wrong. This whole thing is wasting the time of anyone who makes the mistake of thinking it might be interesting.