3 ms·
I've inadvertently tried this mode yesterday, even before the announcement was made, but found that something weird was going on: - it eats tons and tons of CP
by dur-randir 4y ago
I've inadvertently tried this mode yesterday, even before the announcement was made, but found that something weird was going on:
- it eats tons and tons of CPU, like this is a common picture
6568 root 20 0 7357216 3.2g 20072 R 109.6 1.3 6:10.60 mitmweb
- lots of packets dropped, sometimes at a considerable rate
[14:38:33.501] Dropping incoming packet, TCP channel is full.
This isn't me running some http-hungry application, just immediately after the phone restart. I'm running mitmproxy 9.0.0 installed through pip on Linux with python 3.9.2. Unfortunately it's not easy for me to try any other mode - i've first tried setting up transparent proxy on MacOS, but ssl bindings crash on M1.
- mhils 4y agoThis really shouldn't be the case. What kind of client are you using? Could you open an issue over at https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/issues https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/issues please?
- dur-randir 4y agoDone. Mobile client is the official WireGuard mobile client.