3 ms·

doesn't matter what AMD is going to do if you value ray tracing, dlss, rtx voice, shadowplay, good drivers

• snvzz 4y ago
  >if you value ray tracing AMD has Ray Tracing, too. In RDNA3, it might even perform really well. Nov 3rd is close, and we'll know by then. >dlss Current FSR (open, works on AMD, NVIDIA and Intel) is considered equivalent by reviewers. Differences exist, but neither is better than the other. These differences are now up to individual taste. >rtx voice AMD Noise Suppression. >shadowplay AMD ReLive. But you should be using OBS: It's better than either, and open source. That's what most streamers use, pro and else. >good drivers AMD are better in my experience. YMMV.
  • dvngnt_ 4y ago
    I've never seen a single reviewer say FSR is equal/better than DLSS especially now with 3.0. I would like to see a source for that. I do like that it's open. AMD's ray tracing isn't good yet and is years behind NVIDIA
  • Aerroon 4y ago
    Even if you use OBS nvenc is way better than AMD's offering. You'd just use nvenc through OBS, unless you want to dedicate half of your CPU to recording. Even if you do that you'll still take a performance impact in anything else you're doing.
    • snvzz 4y ago
      AMD's hardware encoder can of course be used with OBS, and it is actually good as of OBS 28.
      • Aerroon 4y ago
        The problem isn't with OBS. The problem is with AMD's encoder. Nvenc is much better.