Yeah, sending 48V would be more appropriate, but unfortunately that's not really backwards-compatible (well, the way to do that is typically to allow the PSU t

Yeah, sending 48V would be more appropriate, but unfortunately that's not really backwards-compatible (well, the way to do that is typically to allow the PSU to be farther from the use-site, like having a datacenter with tall adult high cabinets (racks; they have 4 posts for holding the equipment, which is standardized as occupying one-or-more slots of 1¾ inch height and free to occupy the entire length) and putting 4 AC/DC converter blocks into each such cabinet, to power a few layers of servers/equipment both above and below the PSU layer. They do this so that the PSU can be made up of multiple redundant modules, and to integrate some batteries that can cover a generator starting up. This way they don't need to pay for a dedicated UPS battery with chargers and inverters just to convert it back to lower-voltage DC near the server. They can make it so that for example 5-8 PSUs spread over different electrical circuits can share the load of the servers, even if 2-3 of them fail (so they, for example, only need 2 extra on top of the 5 that can power the servers and the 1 that recharges the battery (62.5% load if everything works and the servers are running full-power), or even relying on the servers occasionally running below full power to spread the full rated server power over 6 modules with 2 spares (75% load if everything works and the servers are running full-power)). A big issue in this situation here is though that Nvidia skimps heavily on board space for the 4090 Founders Edition cards, seemingly to use the back for heat sink fins/air-flow cross-section. It would take up some board area, but in theory, they could add a 48V power option that makes it all sleek and pretty, possibly with a 12V->48V adapter for the people who don't already have a 48V supply.