3 ms·
Except that’s not what they’re doing, so I’ve no idea why you think that a relevant argument. They’re working for a different public company while being paid by
by girvo 4y ago
Except that’s not what they’re doing, so I’ve no idea why you think that a relevant argument. They’re working for a different public company while being paid by Telsa.
- bagacrap 4y agoTwitter is no longer public.
- arcticbull 4y agoNot public anymore, they were delisted this past Friday, but the rest of your point stands ofc.
- chimeracoder 4y ago> They’re working for a different public company while being paid by Telsa. Actually, it's worse than that. They're working for a different, private company, one which happens to be owned by the CEO of TSLA, who has a legal and fiduciary duty to the TSLA shareholders.
- Sunspark 4y agoWhy would a TSLA shareholder make a fuss? It is likely that Tesla will bill Twitter for the use of staff resources. Other than that, being on good terms with the owner of Twitter is a possible advertising opportunity/tie-in in the future.