The parent post wasn't suggesting that she didn't have a problem, but rather that the suggested treatment by an organization whose sole purpose is to identify a

The parent post wasn't suggesting that she didn't have a problem, but rather that the suggested treatment by an organization whose sole purpose is to identify and treat these cases was not appropriate for her circumstances. They've essentially got a vested interest in over-diagnosing, and parent sniffed that out. It is entirely possible that, had she not improved, parent would have gone back, or found another source of treatment. I didn't see anything at all in the parent's post to indicate that they have a `disdain for the "condition"`. You might be projecting your own experiences a little too much.