4 ms·
"The note continues, “Please come prepared with code as a backup to review on your own machines with Elon.” Later, people inside the company reported that Tesla
by MangoCoffee 4y ago
"The note continues, “Please come prepared with code as a backup to review on your own machines with Elon.” Later, people inside the company reported that Tesla engineers were in fact reviewing the code."
Can anyone verify this story?
- themitigating 4y agoImagine I said I could. Why would you believe me if you don't believe the Washington Post?
- Cupertino95014 4y agoI don't know you, but that's a low bar. WaPo has zero standards of journalistic integrity anymore. They will print anything that draws clicks.
- themitigating 4y agoIs that the case here? What's the probability that it is?
- Cupertino95014 4y agoThat what is?
- themitigating 4y agoSorry, that the article is truthful
- Cupertino95014 4y agodon't know. OP made a general statement about WaPo, and my remark followed on that. It wasn't about any one article.
- MangoCoffee 4y agohttps://archive.ph/xtF0x https://archive.ph/xtF0x "Later, people inside the company reported that Tesla engineers were in fact reviewing the code." really?
- Cupertino95014 4y agoActually, I will stick up for the use of anonymous sources, even by a partisan rag like WaPo. That's the only way the truth can get out, sometimes. When the official sources are all corp speak BS, then unnamed "people inside the company" are what's left. Inescapably, you have to trust that the paper is not just making it up. The more they use the news to push their politics, the less people will trust them, unfortunately.
- themitigating 4y agoEven if a news source is bias it doesn't mean they are lying.
- Cupertino95014 4y agoNo, indeed. You still have to judge if something they say happened, actually happened.
- MangoCoffee 4y ago"Later, people inside the company reported that Tesla engineers were in fact reviewing the code." lets say you could. is your source = "people inside the company"?