3 ms·
I think it's static inasmuch as it isn't an inherently adversarial problem. The world isn't bent on thwarting self-driving cars. Bot authors are bent on subvert
by DFHippie 4y ago
I think it's static inasmuch as it isn't an inherently adversarial problem. The world isn't bent on thwarting self-driving cars. Bot authors are bent on subverting detection.
- ceejayoz 4y ago> The world isn't bent on thwarting self-driving cars. Oh, that'll come.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- bumby 4y agoThat’s fair, but I don’t think it explains the “well defined” part of the claim. They problem is so ill defined that it sometimes has to be modeled as random events instead of a deterministic physical process.
- jjfoooo6 4y agoWhat I mean to convey by "well defined" is that even though the problem space of self driving cars is enormous, the success criteria of teaching a car to self drive is probably going to look pretty similar in 10 years to what it looks like now. Bots on the other hand changes constantly - what is the definition of an abusive bot? What is the definition of spam? The adversaries on Twitter adapt not only their tactics but also their goals.