> Do people really believe this is something that happens? What do you think the point of making all those TV procedurals was? Jurors have been explicitly tra

> Do people really believe this is something that happens? What do you think the point of making all those TV procedurals was? Jurors have been explicitly trained to care about "scientific evidence" to the exclusion of all else. Look at the Chauvin trial. Dude committed murder captured by a half dozen cameras, but the trial spent about 80% of time agonizing over nigh-irrelevant scientific evidence, because that's what the jury cares about.