4 ms·
I had a very good experience using safe 4.x The whole department participated. Edge Software Cloud platform Application team It allowed the 3 teams to have bet
by charbull 4y ago
I had a very good experience using safe 4.x
The whole department participated.
Edge Software
Cloud platform
Application team
It allowed the 3 teams to have better communication, things were written, we knew what we are building and how/who is using it.
Met with stakeholders regularly for feedback and better understanding of the business in general, the strategy and why we need to land this feature either to differentiate or because it is priority 0 asked by many customers.
As a team member safe allowed me to understand why what I am working on is important for the business and how it brings value.
I wonder if it is a people problem that we are blaming safe for or an actual process problem?
- lostdog 4y agoDescribe how it works in 1 paragraph or less.
- tbalsam 4y agoSome problem might be it's both a people and a process problem. There may be little to nothing about it that is objectively, technically "wrong". But maybe it doesn't work for 90-95% of people. It sounds like most of what you listed is something that could be accomplished with a good scrum team that has a well-defined, prioritized, and pruned backlog (as necessary.... :))
- derekbaker783 4y agoNone of that requires SAFe, and would be probably be less costly to achieve without SAFe.