> Also, a simple string match on the URL would expose the attempted fraud on Google's end. I feel like your general argument is proving too much: Google clearl

> Also, a simple string match on the URL would expose the attempted fraud on Google's end. I feel like your general argument is proving too much: Google clearly indicated this is an Ad, and you couldn’t reasonably hold Google or any other publisher of ads responsible for every claim made in every ad. However, I agree that the domain part is troubling, and even seems like a potentially misleading representation by Google — I’m surprised you’re able to set this arbitrarily. However, as discussed in a thread below, maybe you can’t and this is exploiting an open redirect in gimp.org? I think some details would be needed before you can jump to assigning blame so quickly.