>Well, you haven’t. There is absolutely nothing in the current AI state of the art which points towards that. As many as been telling you, you are scared of gho

>Well, you haven’t. There is absolutely nothing in the current AI state of the art which points towards that. As many as been telling you, you are scared of ghosts. It's called logic, there are no ghosts here. If improvements arrive incrementally as they have been for the last decade with milestones like Dall-E, GPT-3, Alpha Go, Deep Blue. These events form what's called an "upward trend". If you project that trend following mathematical statistical procedures with a trend line, you can "project" that line into the future. That is called a "linear projection". That trend is far more mathematical, far more logical then any other evaluation you can come up with. Everything you have are just qualitative opinions. Literally I have time on the X-axis and "amount of things computers are able to do almost as good if not better then humans" on the Y-axis. That trend line flows back from, the inception of computing. Not just a decade of data but half a century. My conclusions are DATA driven. Your conclusions are just gut feelings. If you deny this you are illogical. There is no other way of putting this. >Did the loop make workers disappear? Did cameras made us stop painting? Wtf is the loop? Did automation in factories make workers disappear? Did cameras make us stop painting? The answer is yes. Many painters who use to go to peoples houses to paint portraits.... most of those occupations HAVE disappeared. Same with factory workers, automation wiped a lot of them out (aka disappeared). You can see the results of it today... the wealth inequality we see in the world is partly the result of technology. You are in huge denial if you think technology doesn't make occupations disappear. This kind of thing is a Well known economic phenomenon NOT exclusive to AI. When technology improves workers in related fields become less. There are loads and loads of quantitative line graphs with trend lines that show this and economists who can back it up. >What you wrote were written in exactly the same way for all these innovations. You will pass, progress will march on. What do you mean I will pass? Of course progress will march on. There's NOTHING anyone can do to stop it. AI will steam roll entire industries including eventually itself. You already have ML building models and ML training itself. You're like a climate denier. I'm saying global warming is inevitable. It will happen. There is nothing left humanity can do to change the current trend. You're saying there is no trend. No evidence. No data within the last century at all. Not to be insulting but this is total and complete blindness. Literally I am describing to you trend lines and data points and you're unable to see how biased you are.