In English, the title is perfectly fine. It just says the plane landed, not how it was landed. The title is correct, and while the pilot does deserve recognit

In English, the title is perfectly fine. It just says the plane landed, not how it was landed. The title is correct, and while the pilot does deserve recognition for the impressive feat, the article is primarily about the plane, not the pilot, so changing the focus of the title from the plane to the pilot is not appropriate in this instance. The subtitle is terrible though: it mentions "he" (the pilot), but doesn't say who "he" is. So for the subtitle to make sense, the pilot's name should be in the title. Perhaps it was originally written with the pilot's name, but was changed by an editor for the reason listed above.