10 ms·
However, it is also complex and has been worked on by many people which increases the chances of bugs due to mis-understandings between team members. In contra
by raesene9 4y ago
However, it is also complex and has been worked on by many people which increases the chances of bugs due to mis-understandings between team members.
In contrast BearSSL is kept simple, and is primarily the work of a single author, who knows a lot about cryptography
- nicce 4y agoThere are pros and cons always. But it is not good either if there is only one primary developer. There is a high risk that single author becomes blind for is own bad coding practices, if there are some, and they will repeat. It is also difficult to understand every possible use-case alone.