3 ms·
This logic is flawed. X is not in Y, so we shouldn’t add it, because currently in Y no one is using neither X nor some crippled parody of it.
by wruza 4y ago
This logic is flawed. X is not in Y, so we shouldn’t add it, because currently in Y no one is using neither X nor some crippled parody of it.
- ris58h 4y agoYou haven't answered the questions. I don't see a reason to use RDBMS in a browser, if it's not, for example, an SQL tutorial site. You gave an example of a t-shirt store. A plain array of JS objects is enough to store items in a browser. Why do you need a fully backed RDBMS for it?
- wruza 4y agoBecause it’s a better programming model.
- ris58h 4y ago> better Sorry, but it's just you opinion. Do you have proofs of how t-shirt store will benefit of putting RDBMS on a client side (how much space does it take BTW) instead of using simple list of objects? And you still haven't answered the questions.