One might expect the research to cite previous work, but no: http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/reports/TR2011-705.pdf http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/reports/TR2011-705.p

One might expect the research to cite previous work, but no: http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/reports/TR2011-705.pdf http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/reports/TR2011-705.pdf Related work: To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to reconsider traditional UNIX tools given the increase in higher-level languages that include non-regular constructs (such as blocks nested at arbitrary depth).