>The real (and in this context, irrelevant) question is - should we use it? There is enough. You are technical correct but my point still stands. If the answer

>The real (and in this context, irrelevant) question is - should we use it? There is enough. You are technical correct but my point still stands. If the answer is no because we don't mine enough rivers and beaches, and we don't relocate enough of humanity, how will there be enough living space that people don't seek a distraction?