3 ms·
I think Microsoft was a lot more restrictive with source licenses - generally only universities for research purposes (and Windows Research Kernel was never the
by skissane 4y ago
I think Microsoft was a lot more restrictive with source licenses - generally only universities for research purposes (and Windows Research Kernel was never the full OS anyway), some ISVs with specially negotiated deals, and some government agencies. The average customer couldn’t get access to the source code. Whereas, OpenVMS for example, I think basically any licensee could order the source.
- wazoox 4y agoNT 3.5 and 4.0 on 4 (IIRC) and 8 processors machines required to be compiled from source on the target host, the shipping kernel only supporting 2 processors and cross-compilation not being an option. Fun times :)