> Do you see how those two statements strongly contradict one another? Nope, no contradiction at all. You can have adversity and not have systemic racism. I do

> Do you see how those two statements strongly contradict one another? Nope, no contradiction at all. You can have adversity and not have systemic racism. I don’t have the foggiest clue how you can think that is a contradiction. > people with white sounding names are 50% more likely to receive a callback for a job interview.[1] Fair enough, but how is this remotely “systemic”? Do you really think there are company policies that promote this? Or is this individual (I.e. not systemic) biases? Unless the company policy is to prefer the resumes with white sounding names then I don’t see how this is systemic.