3 ms·
> How exactly could a TPM be required for Linux? Of course it would not be "required" required—so long as you're okay with maintaining your own distro, with fo
by ilammy 4y ago
> How exactly could a TPM be required for Linux?
Of course it would not be "required" required—so long as you're okay with maintaining your own distro, with forks of everything having essential TPM-based security features excised, working with your own builds of the kernel. Good luck selling this your employer.
- mustache_kimono 4y ago> Of course it would not be "required" required So, it's not literally true. It's just vibes, man. And I guess that's what disappoints me. If lots of Linux people see TPM as a good thing that should be adopted in the major distros (not unlike systemd), because of the benefits, what's the problem? > Good luck selling this your employer. What are you selling exactly?