4 ms·
I would imagine a uniform distribution of people from across racial, political, age, and socio-economic classes would be a good start. The theory is that if a m
by throwaway4837 4y ago
I would imagine a uniform distribution of people from across racial, political, age, and socio-economic classes would be a good start. The theory is that if a moderation council is mostly well-off, white liberals, then their decisions will more likely contain bias from those sorts of people. A moderation council needs people of various ages, races, and political backgrounds so that the net bias in their decisions is reduced.
I would also imagine that a dozen people isn't enough to achieve a good enough distribution over these variables. They might need a more scaled moderation approach that involves potentially hundreds of individuals, like a jury, but much bigger.
- lelanthran 4y ago> I would also imagine that a dozen people isn't enough to achieve a good enough distribution over these variables. They might need a more scaled moderation approach that involves potentially hundreds of individuals, like a jury, but much bigger. I like that; add in "banning decisions must be unanimous" and I think you'll have better decisions.
- fleddr 4y agoIn such a diverse council, which in theory is good, you'll find that moderation policy will be dominated by whatever the "marginalized" members say. Which quite likely is the way it already works.
- hackernewds 4y agoWe have arrived at the peak of capitalism where corporations are as powerful as governments
- solardev 4y agoI think they've been more powerful for decades now...