4 ms·
Every time I've reported something it's taken well over a week for Twitter to respond; all denied, and all of them were very clear-cut cases IMO (I don't have t
by Beltalowda 4y ago
Every time I've reported something it's taken well over a week for Twitter to respond; all denied, and all of them were very clear-cut cases IMO (I don't have the exact phrasings at hand, but all involved people fantasising about smashing someone's face in with a brick because they didn't like something they said).
I don't expect moderation to be 100% consistent or 100% perfect, but now it just seems like such a random unpredictable crapshoot that it's pretty broken IMO.
- ghostpepper 4y agoI'm not sure what country you're in, or what the law is in the US, but I think there's a difference between saying "I want to to smash their face in with a brick" and "someone should smash their face in with a brick" It seems to me that the call to action or lack thereof is salient. That being said I have no idea if this was the reason why it was allowed. There's no transparency.
- Beltalowda 4y agoI agree there's a (subtle) difference, and legally this difference may certainly matter, but everyone knows what's intended and IMO neither have their place on a platform where "people have a free and safe space to talk" (from Twitter's "About" page).