5 ms·
> Do you know that Ukrainians are buying and paying subscriptions for that. I'm sure the return on investment is very well calculated. I'm sorry, did the Starl
by misiti3780 4y ago
> Do you know that Ukrainians are buying and paying subscriptions for that. I'm sure the return on investment is very well calculated.
I'm sorry, did the Starlink units not help ?
> Is East-Germany worth the risk of nuclear war in your opinion, or not?
Last time I checked, Germany was a member of NATO.
- koonsolo 4y ago> I'm sorry, did the Starlink units not help ? Of course, any business is a win-win for both parties. But don't act as if it's from of the kindness of the heart. > Last time I checked, Germany was a member of NATO. Funny, because last time I checked, the Baltic states are too. But I guess NATO could give those up to avoid nuclear war. You didn't respond to them being taken over by Russia, did you?
- misiti3780 4y agoI guess I meant "Last time I checked, they are all members of NATO"
- koonsolo 4y agoA conflict with NATO has a higher chance of turning nuclear than a conflict with Ukraine. So maybe we should exclude the Baltic states and give them to Russia? To avoid a nuclear war?
- misiti3780 4y agoI dont understand your point. Who is talkinga bout giving the Baltic states to Russia? Not me.
- koonsolo 4y agoYou are defending Elon, who said to give Crimea to Russia to "prevent nulcear war". I'm just wondering how much stuff you want to give to Russia to "prevent nuclear war". So give Crimea to Russia, yes. Donbas too? Baltic states you said no. Can they take the rest of Ukraine to prevent nuclear war? For me, the line is pretty easy: Russia respects the borders as internationally defined. And I don't really give a shit how much they threaten with nuclear war. For you and Elon, you seem to want to give Russia some stuff and hope it ends there. Well, it never ends there, so that's why I ask where you will draw the line.