3 ms·

He implied in a few interviews that he wants to turn it into a WeChat version of the west. Doesn't 200M+ daily active users opens up that door.

djvdq 4y ago
You have to remember that those 200M+ users are located in many, many countries, with different laws and customs
bambax 4y ago
He mentioned "the everything app" I think once? But -- IMHO -- people who tweet don't fit the profile of people who would need such an app. They're trying to sell stuff, not buy stuff.
- Slartie 4y ago
  They are also demonstrating that they're likely to use specialized services for specific tasks - Twitter is a very specialized tool. This is the exact opposite from someone who draws any profit from an "everything app". If not even Facebook with its userbase of people already using a single mediocre tool for different purposes manages to crack the "everything app for the west" nut, Twitter is bound to fail. Maybe everyone is bound to fail simply because the concept does not fly in the west.
dathinab 4y ago
It doesn't for the same reason there isn't already a "WeChat" of the west. Additionally Twitter has as far as I can tell (speculative) a much much less stable foundation in the EU then it seems if you just look at daily users count.
- nghou 4y ago
  > It doesn't for the same reason there isn't already a "WeChat" of the west. iMessage? (US) WhatsApp? (EU)
  - dathinab 4y ago
    WeChat is so much more then WhatsApp (for China) EDIT: It's not only what everyone has (WeChat in China), instead of just many people (WhatsApp in EU). It's also the default payment service, you pay through it all the time in all kinds of situations. It's like WhatsApp but more monopolistic combined with PayPal but also more monopolistic. And both with full government support so no worries some bank lobby gets in you way.
  - rburhum 4y ago
    payments? community? local user discovery? etc etc
adrr 4y ago
Twitter is a microblogging site. Not a messaging platform. He could have bought snapchat which is based on messaging.
- tomrod 4y ago
  Twitter is a pool of highly capable people, a large user base, and, currently, opportunity. A messaging platform added to their microblogging service is not outside the realm. It already has DM and Vine-like video.
  - adrr 4y ago
    Digg tried to pivot too.
    - tomrod 4y ago
      Indeed. They weren't as successful after. Perhaps Twitter repeats history, or perhaps they do something new.
bushbaba 4y ago
You assume 200M+ human daily active users. A large portion of Twitter's DAU & MAU are bots.
jameshart 4y ago
I can't square that ambition with the idea that Twitter is 4x overstaffed and needs to shed 75% of its workforce, though. If he has ambitions to turn Twitter into an Everything App, he'll need to diverrt a significant portion of the workforce onto that project, leaving him with a fraction of a fraction of the current workforce to keep Twitter's microblogging and ad shilling platform up and running.

djvdq 4y ago

You have to remember that those 200M+ users are located in many, many countries, with different laws and customs

bambax 4y ago

He mentioned "the everything app" I think once? But -- IMHO -- people who tweet don't fit the profile of people who would need such an app. They're trying to sell stuff, not buy stuff.

Slartie 4y ago
They are also demonstrating that they're likely to use specialized services for specific tasks - Twitter is a very specialized tool. This is the exact opposite from someone who draws any profit from an "everything app". If not even Facebook with its userbase of people already using a single mediocre tool for different purposes manages to crack the "everything app for the west" nut, Twitter is bound to fail. Maybe everyone is bound to fail simply because the concept does not fly in the west.

dathinab 4y ago

It doesn't for the same reason there isn't already a "WeChat" of the west. Additionally Twitter has as far as I can tell (speculative) a much much less stable foundation in the EU then it seems if you just look at daily users count.

nghou 4y ago
> It doesn't for the same reason there isn't already a "WeChat" of the west. iMessage? (US) WhatsApp? (EU)
- dathinab 4y ago
  WeChat is so much more then WhatsApp (for China) EDIT: It's not only what everyone has (WeChat in China), instead of just many people (WhatsApp in EU). It's also the default payment service, you pay through it all the time in all kinds of situations. It's like WhatsApp but more monopolistic combined with PayPal but also more monopolistic. And both with full government support so no worries some bank lobby gets in you way.
- rburhum 4y ago
  payments? community? local user discovery? etc etc

adrr 4y ago

Twitter is a microblogging site. Not a messaging platform. He could have bought snapchat which is based on messaging.

tomrod 4y ago
Twitter is a pool of highly capable people, a large user base, and, currently, opportunity. A messaging platform added to their microblogging service is not outside the realm. It already has DM and Vine-like video.
- adrr 4y ago
  Digg tried to pivot too.
  - tomrod 4y ago
    Indeed. They weren't as successful after. Perhaps Twitter repeats history, or perhaps they do something new.

bushbaba 4y ago

You assume 200M+ human daily active users. A large portion of Twitter's DAU & MAU are bots.

jameshart 4y ago

I can't square that ambition with the idea that Twitter is 4x overstaffed and needs to shed 75% of its workforce, though. If he has ambitions to turn Twitter into an Everything App, he'll need to diverrt a significant portion of the workforce onto that project, leaving him with a fraction of a fraction of the current workforce to keep Twitter's microblogging and ad shilling platform up and running.