3 ms·
Completely missing from this blog post are: 1. Instructions on how to legitimately share photos with medical providers. 2. A transparent appeal process 3. An
by BXLE_1-1-BitIs1 4y ago
Completely missing from this blog post are:
1. Instructions on how to legitimately share photos with medical providers.
2. A transparent appeal process
3. An address for legal service.
The family that sent a photo of their toddler's penile lesion to their pediatrician is still left in the ditch.
Will their ever be an apology and reinstatement for this family?
- T3OU-736 4y agoWhile I wholeheartedly agree that Google should reverse the their actions in this case, I would argue that Google Drive/Photos is not the right "product" for medical (so, in the US, HIPPA-protected) data exchange.
- BXLE_1-1-BitIs1 4y agoThe Google default is that your photos get automatically uploaded. And then it's Bambi meets Godzilla. Google's AI would do better to refuse to upload and notify the user that the photo may be CSAM - AND give the user an opportunity to reply to a human AND explain the appeal process.
- GaryNumanVevo 4y agoI feel like we'll never hear the full details of that story. It seems like a pretty easy thing to fix from Google's side. However, I think it's telling that he still remains banned and Google hasn't made any public statement. It feels like a constructed narrative piece. It's definitely a possibility that the father had CSAM in his possession and decided to go to the media, trying to get his account back, knowing full well that Google can't confirm or deny it publicly.