2 ms·
The conundrum is: how do you build an organization that can simultaneously scale super-linearly and retain a commitment to quality? There are plenty of business
by btown 4y ago
The conundrum is: how do you build an organization that can simultaneously scale super-linearly and retain a commitment to quality? There are plenty of businesses that pursue stable profitability or linear growth and maintain quality. But the faster an organization grows, the more it becomes metrics-driven, and outside of a regulated industry where quality is a requirement, it's hard to balance the priorities.
I'm reminded of Honeycomb's pointed experiment in setting up a rotating employee seat as a voting member of their board: https://www.protocol.com/workplace/board-of-directors-honeycomb-engineer https://www.protocol.com/workplace/board-of-directors-honeyc... - this type of thing can contribute towards striking the right balance at all levels of an organization. But it's definitely not a solved problem.
- colechristensen 4y agoApple did by having a quality dictator at the top. It would have lasted a lot longer but his unusual disposition led him to accidentally kill himself with a strange diet. In other words you can’t have a company run by the MBA mindset, there must be a superseding set of values beyond business school values.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]