2 ms·
Got it, so your response is "it doesn't, and that's good because <word salad>". The equality of opportunity vs outcome dichotomy conservatives like you present
by howinteresting 4y ago
Got it, so your response is "it doesn't, and that's good because <word salad>".
The equality of opportunity vs outcome dichotomy conservatives like you present is nonsense. Individualism and freedom (values I care about) are made better with greater redistribution, not worse.
- anonym29 4y agoI'm not remotely close to a conservative, I'm pro-abortion (not pro-choice), anti-war, am staunchy opposed to the existence of social security and medicare altogether, think the DoD should be defunded, don't hold any religious / spiritual views and don't think they have any place in public life, am dating a trans woman, I believe Reagan, Bush, and Trump were all among the top 10 worst presidents we ever had, etc. It's clear to me that you're engaged in partisan ad-hominem rather than a rational, reason-based debate, and therefore are not arguing in good faith. Have a nice day.
- howinteresting 4y agoOh, even worse, you're a right-wing libertarian. Never mind.
- anonym29 4y ago>pro-abortion >anti-war >think the DoD should be defunded >don't hold any religious / spiritual views >dating a trans woman >hate Reagan, Bush, and Trump It is cognitive dissonance to classify these positions and views as right-wing, plain and simple. You're projecting a binary worldview onto a nuanced world.
- howinteresting 4y agoYou are (economically) right-wing because of your views about equality of opportunity vs outcome, which is an incredibly right-wing framing of the debate. You dating a trans woman or hating Reagan doesn't make you not right-wing; plenty of trans women are themselves right-wing.