3 ms·
You're right, but that doesn't stop it from sucking. Like every defense of Adobe and Pantone here are technically correct and rational, but that doesn't stop th
by moolcool 4y ago
You're right, but that doesn't stop it from sucking. Like every defense of Adobe and Pantone here are technically correct and rational, but that doesn't stop this from being a stupid problem which is deeply unfair to the consumer.
- ehnto 4y agoOh I agree wholeheartedly. And we will probably be bringing up the Adobe Pantone debacle in ten years when auto owners suddenly lose access to their heated seats because their licensing ran out, or somthing equally asinine. We seem to be very busy applying all these same mistakes but to real world products like coffee pod machines, cars and TVs, home security and such.
- tanseydavid 4y agoThe problem emanates from the supply end. They all want their recurring revenue because some other corporation is doing it. There is no more thought put into it than that.
- Gibbon1 4y agoI own some shares in a company and took a look at what their valuation would be. play sad trombone sound. It did appear that companies with reoccurring revenue based on a monopoly are valued much higher than ones that produce single shot revenue. I think the solution would be to change corporate tax laws to even things out a bit. Like treat rents off things like Pantone as pure taxable profit.