4 ms·
This isn't meant to sound to flippant, but try to increase physicality to the point where you don't have to think as hard about calorie intake. A brisk one hou
by algoatecorn 4y ago
This isn't meant to sound to flippant, but try to increase physicality to the point where you don't have to think as hard about calorie intake. A brisk one hour walk on hills can easily burn 600cal. At the same time, your BMR will go up due to increased fitness
- skeeter2020 4y ago>> A brisk one hour walk on hills can easily burn 600cal This is optimistic to the point of being close to a lie. Most people walking for an hour are going to burn closer to 250-300 cal. At the pace and terrain to double this you're not really "walking" anymore, and it's certainly not "easy". The idea of "exercising your way out of overconsumption" is entirely flawed and disproven.
- algoatecorn 4y agoA 250-300cal/hr walk is a casual stroll. Don't move goalposts here. Perceived effort will change from person to person. Besides, I meant the number goal is easy, not the effort. But you knew that and wanted to twist my statement to fit your view. A quick google search results in a range from 400-600cal/hr for brisk, hilly walks. You could also use the word "hike" but that requires nature which some people don't have access to. >The idea of "exercising your way out of overconsumption" is entirely flawed and disproven. Obvious one would still be attempting to reduce calorie intake throughout this scenario. But for the people who say "exercise just doesn't make a difference in my weight loss" - that is indeed flawed. You can absolutely exercise your way into a deficit. Perhaps you haven't had that experience. To that, I would say your workload is probably not high enough to experience it.
- watwut 4y agoI cam tell you, that idea works pretty well. With added bonus that you gain stamina and strength. Exercise is proven to improve your health results.