3 ms·
This is a great writeup and Lane's book looks pretty interesting. One thing I'd add is that knowledge of the Krebs cycle (aka, 'tricarboxylic acid cycle') help
by photochemsyn 4y ago
This is a great writeup and Lane's book looks pretty interesting. One thing I'd add is that knowledge of the Krebs cycle (aka, 'tricarboxylic acid cycle') helps people understand why some dieting approaches seem a bit unwise to biochemists. A simple explanation of the Krebs cycle is that it is a kind of engine that sits at the center of metabolism, but metabolism is not just the breakdown of molecules for energy, it's also the construction of molecules for various cellular needs. Take this quote as a beginning point:
> "...we were told the monstrous names of its component parts—succinate, pyruvate, Acetyl-CoA, cytochrome c—while, on the blackboard, we counted NAD+s and FADH2s, and followed “redox” reactions as they “oxidized” or “reduced” elements."
From a biochemist's point of view, there are about three classes of foodstuffs - carbohydrates (which break down to simple sugars), proteins (which break down to amino acids), and fats and oils (which break down to fatty acds). All those breakdown products are fed in one way or the other into the Krebs cycle (for amino acids, the nitrogen is stripped off and excreted as urea). These energy-producing (i.e. NADH / ATP generating) reactions are grouped under the heading of catabolism. If you entirely exclude any of these three classes of foods, such as by ingesting only protein, the Krebs cycle and affiliated metabolism starts doing some funny stuff. This is the basis of 'eat a balanced diet' advice.
Note that the Krebs cycle also sits at the center of your body's biosynthetic system, which is continually manufacturing the non-essential amino acids, as well as sugar and lipid synthesis, which then form the basis of hormone and neurotransmitter synthesis. The molecules in the above quote are, in various cells, exported out of the Krebs cycle and into these biosynthetic pathways. Unbalancing the Krebs cycle by depriving it of essential feedstocks can thus throw a lot of your body's fundamental systems out of whack. Since the Krebs cycle is highly regulated and somewhat malleable, it can respond in various ways to account for this, but problems can arise over time.
Hence, the best dieting approach for losing (adipose, i.e. fatty tissue) weight is most likely intermittent fasting with a carefully balanced (carbs/proteins/fats) diet, just less food overall. Under such fasting conditions, the fatty tissues get converted to things like ketone bodies and hence to glucose (the brain's primary fuel). Here's a collection of abstracts on how this works in intermittent fasting (it's also related to diabetic issues):
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/ketone-bodies https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biolog...
Note that regular exercise is also good for your health, but that's not necessarily 'burning fat' so much as it is improving your circulatory system, and flushing your lungs with plenty of air, as well as improving muscle tone.
- 323 4y agoWhy do you think we don't have ATP running in the bloodstream instead of requiring each cell to produce it's own ATP? As in, why don't we have an "energy organ" which runs the Krebs cycle and outputs ATP for the whole body? Removing the Krebs cycle from each cell would be a ultra-fundamental change, so hard to evolve, but adding the ability to supplement ATP from the bloodstream seems doable.
- photochemsyn 4y agoLifetime is the issue. ATP and its cousins, and similar energy-transmitters like creatine phosphate, are hot potatoes. The phosphate group rapidly transfers its energy to other molecules in the cell, and exporting it to the bloodstream just wouldn't work, it'd break down in transit. > "In human beings, for example, the amount of ATP recycled daily is about the same as body weight, even though the average human being only has about 250 grams of ATP. Another way to look at it is that a single molecule of ATP gets recycled 500-700 times every day. At any moment in time, the amount of ATP plus ADP is fairly constant. This is important since ATP is not a molecule that can be stored for later use. " https://www.thoughtco.com/atp-important-molecule-in-metabolism-4050962 https://www.thoughtco.com/atp-important-molecule-in-metaboli... Most of energy biochemistry can be viewed as a system for trapping energetic short-lived species (such as high-energy electrons produced by cytochrome oxidases or the photosynthetic reaction centers) into slightly longer-lived systems (such as protein gradients across a cell membrane) which in turn are converted to somewhat more persistent species (ATP and NAD(P)H) which circulate within cells), and then into the most stable energy stores, like glucose, lactate, etc. which circulate through the bloodstream and transfer energy between cells (with glucose eventually being stored as glycogen in the liver, and eventually, as fatty tissues, or in plants, starchy roots). The times go as nanoseconds -> milliseconds -> seconds -> minutes/hours/days.
- oifjsidjf 4y ago"Just less food overall" never works. There are 2 diets that work for weight loss: 1) High-fat, low carb. 2) High-carb, low fat. Stick to one of those and keep the fat-to-carb ration in a 1:6 or 6:1 ratio based on what you pick (this ration comes from the eg Japanese eating 6x carbs for each 1g fat). This is why opposing diets like carnivore or the potato diet both work, despite them being on the opposite extremes of the high fat vs high carb spectrum. But god help you if you mix fats and carbs in the same amount... The randle cycle is the likely explanation.