4 ms·
You could also easily claim the inverse: the lack of Democrats shows that the refusal to contemplate a lab leak is political. Besides, since when is something
by origin_path 4y ago
You could also easily claim the inverse: the lack of Democrats shows that the refusal to contemplate a lab leak is political.
Besides, since when is something being political a problem? You'd expect the party in opposition to investigate the wrongdoings of the government, that's part of their job.
- melling 4y agoIt’s easy to offer innuendo. “The voting machines are rigged…” I like Bill Barr’s answer: “It’s all bullshit” Going from one BS story to the next, seeing what sticks then saying “see we were right” is growing old. How about providing evidence with each new theory. Now did China engineer the virus, or was it one that they were studying and it escaped? I’m having a hard time keeping up.
- origin_path 4y agoYou demand evidence, but the report is a review of the evidence, so they're doing exactly what you ask. Are you sure you're not the one who is offering innuendo here? You were insinuating and now outright stating that the entire theory is politically motivated bullshit, but that's not true. There have been people around the world, unaffiliated with US politics, digging up evidence for this for the last two years, always being shouted down by people who don't seem to want to face the possibility that "science", "expertise" and the state science bureaucracy were directly responsible for COVID. "Now did China engineer the virus, or was it one that they were studying and it escaped? I’m having a hard time keeping up." Why not read the report and let us know what it says on that question? Those two possibilities aren't mutually exclusive after all.
- melling 4y agoThe report is noise: “More likely than not..” “More information is needed…”