Given that the IPCC projections have been consistently conservative, and have been revised upward repeatedly, i personally do not consider 2.9 an extreme value.

Given that the IPCC projections have been consistently conservative, and have been revised upward repeatedly, i personally do not consider 2.9 an extreme value. >It assumes that we never hit net zero CO2 production, and that GHG emissions continue on their current path through 2050 with only minimal mitigatons You mean...the path we are basically on, and have been on, since decades despite knowing the consequences? "Not the stated plan" is doing a lot of lifting here.